<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apache vs LiteSpeed.. Time to switch ??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/</link>
	<description>I would try to share what I have learnt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-11572</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-11572</guid>
		<description>are you nuts? litespeed is used [and has been used for a couple of years] at least by a dozen of web hosting providers on their shared hosting servers..so much to the fact it is unknown or in beta stage or anything else... etc,. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you nuts? litespeed is used [and has been used for a couple of years] at least by a dozen of web hosting providers on their shared hosting servers..so much to the fact it is unknown or in beta stage or anything else&#8230; etc,. <img src='http://www.chotocheeta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-8799</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-8799</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t switch to Litespeed yet. Checkout the latest benchmark results and comparison between LSWS and Apache: http://www.unixy.net/apache-vs-litespeed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t switch to Litespeed yet. Checkout the latest benchmark results and comparison between LSWS and Apache: <a href="http://www.unixy.net/apache-vs-litespeed" rel="nofollow">http://www.unixy.net/apache-vs-litespeed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-6258</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-6258</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just now moved FROM Litespeed (free) TO Apache2 (with APC) and have seen an improvement in performance.  Ask your host about caching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just now moved FROM Litespeed (free) TO Apache2 (with APC) and have seen an improvement in performance.  Ask your host about caching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heney</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-5811</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-5811</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using LS (LightSpeed) web server for almost 3 months and it is spectacular.

It increased server response time dramatically especially on the logic-heavy sites (running a lot of PHP), and our sites with Content Managment Systems.

As we all know, a CMS with a lot of plugins/modules/extensions, or even just the CMS itself can create 15-80 mysql transactions per page load... That&#039;s per &quot;hit&quot;.

Load time for our average CMS page was approximately 60-70% faster, after testing 50 of our sites pages.

Firefox offers a good extension called Firebug that includes a tab labeled &#039;net&#039;.  It&#039;s really amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using LS (LightSpeed) web server for almost 3 months and it is spectacular.</p>
<p>It increased server response time dramatically especially on the logic-heavy sites (running a lot of PHP), and our sites with Content Managment Systems.</p>
<p>As we all know, a CMS with a lot of plugins/modules/extensions, or even just the CMS itself can create 15-80 mysql transactions per page load&#8230; That&#8217;s per &#8220;hit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Load time for our average CMS page was approximately 60-70% faster, after testing 50 of our sites pages.</p>
<p>Firefox offers a good extension called Firebug that includes a tab labeled &#8216;net&#8217;.  It&#8217;s really amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choto Cheeta</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4198</link>
		<dc:creator>Choto Cheeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4198</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4194&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sathya&lt;/a&gt; 

Hi,

Choto Cheeta Online is running a managed service is the hosting provider (WiredTree.com) doesnt have option for anything else apart from LiteSpeed and Apache :(

So even if we want, we cant unless we switch our self to a unmanaged service, which would have its own problems :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-4194" rel="nofollow">@Sathya</a> </p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Choto Cheeta Online is running a managed service is the hosting provider (WiredTree.com) doesnt have option for anything else apart from LiteSpeed and Apache <img src='http://www.chotocheeta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So even if we want, we cant unless we switch our self to a unmanaged service, which would have its own problems <img src='http://www.chotocheeta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choto Cheeta</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4197</link>
		<dc:creator>Choto Cheeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4197</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4192&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Gaurish Sharma&lt;/a&gt; 

Hi,

Yes, WP Super Cache is already present in this installation..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-4192" rel="nofollow">@Gaurish Sharma</a> </p>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Yes, WP Super Cache is already present in this installation..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4195</guid>
		<description>BTW I visited your site couple hours ago, it had the old theme, when did you change the theme ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I visited your site couple hours ago, it had the old theme, when did you change the theme ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>why not give lighthttpd ( http://www.lighttpd.net/ ) a shot? Its FOSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not give lighthttpd ( <a href="http://www.lighttpd.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lighttpd.net/</a> ) a shot? Its FOSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaurish Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaurish Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>did you try to enable Caching in WordPress? by Super Cache plugin.

it should greatly reduce load on server as Static HTML pages would be severed instead of dynamic PHP calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did you try to enable Caching in WordPress? by Super Cache plugin.</p>
<p>it should greatly reduce load on server as Static HTML pages would be severed instead of dynamic PHP calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choto Cheeta</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/03/06/apache-vs-litespeed-time-to-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link>
		<dc:creator>Choto Cheeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=1047#comment-4191</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4189&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Gaurish Sharma&lt;/a&gt; 

Wen through few more posts of WHT and have found mixed opinion about LiteSpeed..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-4189" rel="nofollow">@Gaurish Sharma</a> </p>
<p>Wen through few more posts of WHT and have found mixed opinion about LiteSpeed..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.chotocheeta.com @ 2011-10-20 18:15:22 -->
