I would try to share what I have learnt
Apache vs LiteSpeed.. Time to switch ??

Apache has been the leader in web server platform since years. It dominates with over 50% of market share. The key of success for Apache has been the cross platform support along with its open source format.
Every single web host which we use, mostly shared and in some cases VPS, offer us option of Apache only. Every time locally we think of php development, most of the time we use Apache as our web server.
ChotoCheeta.com is no different, since its birth, it is been hosted under Apache, however in last few months my hosting server, which is a managed hybrid located at WiredTree.com Illinois, Chicago facility is facing problem with server load. In a recent reply to one of my support ticket, the server admins of WiredTree.com have suggested to try out a new web server platform.

The LiteSpeed web server is suppose to be more than 6 times faster than Apache while handling heavy traffic and support professionals of WiredTree.com thinks that it is a better option than RAM upgrade. However, compare to Apache, LiteSpeed is a paid product and has limited support for cross platform (in turns of OS).
If you don’t want to try ugprading your RAM we can try out LiteSpeed. It tends to handle massive concurrent connections with PHP much better than Apache.
WiredTree.com would provide LiteSpeed at USD 12 per month only as on demand basis to its customer, that too as a beta offering. Looks impressive.. Isn’t it ?? but the path is totally unknown as, till date, I have not found a single known user using LiteSpeed for a live web site or web project. Therefore if any reader is using LiteSpeed, then I would like to invite you to share your experiance with LiteSpeed.
Although me, my self dont have enough experiance of web server and it would be first time I am trying out LiteSpeed but still I think its time to say bye to Apache and shift to LiteSpeed.
Related posts:
- Know your neighbours Often we are buying hosting from many known and un-known web hosting companies. How do we get an idea how...
- How high can you go – Intel demonstrates a processor with 48 cores Intel is working hard to push their terascale computer platform research to new limits. Recently Intel researchers demonstrated an experimental...
- Windows 7 market share alone beats all version of MAC OS X According to a report published at Computer World, a survey by Net Applications has found that Windows 7 market share...
- WordPress planning to kill support for PHP 4 and MySQL 4 Although, till date WP is one of those software which supports almost all platforms and runs with minimum of support...
| Print article | This entry was posted by Choto Cheeta on March 6, 2009 at 1:44 am, and is filed under Web Development. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |





about 4 months ago
I’ve just now moved FROM Litespeed (free) TO Apache2 (with APC) and have seen an improvement in performance. Ask your host about caching.
about 8 months ago
I’ve been using LS (LightSpeed) web server for almost 3 months and it is spectacular.
It increased server response time dramatically especially on the logic-heavy sites (running a lot of PHP), and our sites with Content Managment Systems.
As we all know, a CMS with a lot of plugins/modules/extensions, or even just the CMS itself can create 15-80 mysql transactions per page load… That’s per “hit”.
Load time for our average CMS page was approximately 60-70% faster, after testing 50 of our sites pages.
Firefox offers a good extension called Firebug that includes a tab labeled ‘net’. It’s really amazing.
about 1 year ago
@Sathya
Hi,
Choto Cheeta Online is running a managed service is the hosting provider (WiredTree.com) doesnt have option for anything else apart from LiteSpeed and Apache
So even if we want, we cant unless we switch our self to a unmanaged service, which would have its own problems
about 1 year ago
@Gaurish Sharma
Hi,
Yes, WP Super Cache is already present in this installation..
about 1 year ago
BTW I visited your site couple hours ago, it had the old theme, when did you change the theme ?
about 1 year ago
why not give lighthttpd ( http://www.lighttpd.net/ ) a shot? Its FOSS.
about 1 year ago
did you try to enable Caching in WordPress? by Super Cache plugin.
it should greatly reduce load on server as Static HTML pages would be severed instead of dynamic PHP calls.
about 1 year ago
@Gaurish Sharma
Wen through few more posts of WHT and have found mixed opinion about LiteSpeed..
about 1 year ago
LiteSpeed is lot faster than apache, specially the enterprise version. Given the high traffic you get, I think you should make the switch. it totally worth it.
A unbiased review here:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=616249
Also compare rates of other web hosting companies for lightspeed
about 1 year ago
@Gaurish Sharma
WiredTree.com is not willing to provide it for free or trial.. I have tried but they wont..
about 1 year ago
why not ask them for a evaluation/demo?
Since its a new product which happens to be in beta stage, you have a right to get a free demo.
Try and post back result
btw, how many daily visits you get on average?