Comments on: Windows Server 2008 is one of the most secure OS of year 2008 http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/ I would try to share what I have learnt Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:41:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Choto Cheeta http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6050 Choto Cheeta Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:22:10 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-6050 Hi David, Please be kind enough to provide the exact URL of HP, in which they have given the comparison :) Thanks again.. Hi David,

Please be kind enough to provide the exact URL of HP, in which they have given the comparison :)

Thanks again..

]]> By: David Glassman http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6041 David Glassman Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:25:02 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-6041 The stats above are not accurate. If one bases the OS on security than MS is among the lowest. I suggest the writer of this blog go to the HP site in which they reviewed every OS. A detailed security test was done with a clustered back-up on all OS's. Revovery for the MS was the lowest. Bottom line: he most secure OS on the planet is....OpenVMS. The hackers convention in Las Vegas refuses to use it since its been established as an OS that can not be hacked. Please get your facts right. Note: I do not work for HP. The stats above are not accurate. If one bases the OS on security than MS is among the lowest. I suggest the writer of this blog go to the HP site in which they reviewed every OS. A detailed security test was done with a clustered back-up on all OS’s. Revovery for the MS was the lowest. Bottom line: he most secure OS on the planet is….OpenVMS. The hackers convention in Las Vegas refuses to use it since its been established as an OS that can not be hacked.

Please get your facts right. Note: I do not work for HP.

]]> By: ahmed http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5060 ahmed Sat, 01 Aug 2009 07:59:51 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-5060 I NEED download WIN XP p2 2008>>>>>>>>>> Please ica nt download this. abs_050@hotmail.com hank you very much …. Advance I NEED download WIN XP p2 2008>>>>>>>>>> Please
ica nt download this.

abs_050@hotmail.com

hank you very much …. Advance

]]> By: ahmed http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-5059 ahmed Sat, 01 Aug 2009 07:57:51 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-5059 I NEED THE FOR WIN XP p2 2008>>>>>>>>>> Please abs_050@hotmail.com hank you very much …. Advance I NEED THE FOR WIN XP p2 2008>>>>>>>>>> Please

abs_050@hotmail.com

hank you very much …. Advance

]]> By: partho http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-4580 partho Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:12:31 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-4580 my simple question no offense to any and all. Linux OS and BSD unices gives away source code of their kernel. Windows also started giving away kernel to public since 2007 before that it was a lengthy process. IBM/HP/Novell never gives away, sun gives away partial OS source code. now considering the fact the source code is given. and OS is nothing but the kernel and the utilities are nothing but tools which help/aid do kernel carry work? WTF (where=w) does IBM's finding comes to picture? and second i am not here as a linux/bsd fanboy, i am here as a tech guy who always gets to feel the wrath of ordinary user who cant even use the simple machine. why this rant? first when they made XP they started to clutter as its easy and vulnerable to all virus. now they made it secure and people cannot work. WTF (w here = what) seriously it doesnt matter who is the OS builder/provider? when it comes to end user? the tech dev chap always ends up banging his/her head on the wall. they first crib windows xp sucks, then windows server is too touch. BS. then linux/BSD sucks as command line and then with a GUI they complain its not like windows. in my opinion? it doesnt matter whether linux/bsd/windows. IDIOTS are IDIOTS. and unless they know how to tweak registry or have a custom kernel? the basic option of using computers to ease a day to day work than visually handicapped one hand user porno watching moron? all OS are useless. it doesn't matter if windows is secure or linux is secure? the end factor is "DOES THE ABNORMAL END ARROGANT USER KNOWS WHAT HE/SHE IS DOING? IF NO THEN ALL OS ARE THE SAME. USELESS. AND NOTHING IS IDIOT PROOF." why this rant? i said for a few companies? use linux as its free and gives away source. it takes a few hours to build from scratch and move on. they refused, then i asked them to build windows from scratch as its free and also solves the purpose of saving bucks, as windows gives the source anyway. they refused. i kicked the job and told them to kiss my ass. so OS doesnt solve the purpose, its the user who needs to get used to the environment. my simple question no offense to any and all.
Linux OS and BSD unices gives away source code of their kernel.
Windows also started giving away kernel to public since 2007 before that it was a lengthy process.
IBM/HP/Novell never gives away, sun gives away partial OS source code.
now considering the fact the source code is given. and OS is nothing but the kernel and the utilities are nothing but tools which help/aid do kernel carry work? WTF (where=w) does IBM’s finding comes to picture?
and second i am not here as a linux/bsd fanboy, i am here as a tech guy who always gets to feel the wrath of ordinary user who cant even use the simple machine.
why this rant? first when they made XP they started to clutter as its easy and vulnerable to all virus. now they made it secure and people cannot work. WTF (w here = what)
seriously it doesnt matter who is the OS builder/provider? when it comes to end user? the tech dev chap always ends up banging his/her head on the wall.
they first crib windows xp sucks, then windows server is too touch. BS. then linux/BSD sucks as command line and then with a GUI they complain its not like windows.
in my opinion? it doesnt matter whether linux/bsd/windows. IDIOTS are IDIOTS. and unless they know how to tweak registry or have a custom kernel? the basic option of using computers to ease a day to day work than visually handicapped one hand user porno watching moron? all OS are useless.
it doesn’t matter if windows is secure or linux is secure? the end factor is “DOES THE ABNORMAL END ARROGANT USER KNOWS WHAT HE/SHE IS DOING? IF NO THEN ALL OS ARE THE SAME. USELESS. AND NOTHING IS IDIOT PROOF.”
why this rant?
i said for a few companies? use linux as its free and gives away source. it takes a few hours to build from scratch and move on. they refused, then i asked them to build windows from scratch as its free and also solves the purpose of saving bucks, as windows gives the source anyway. they refused. i kicked the job and told them to kiss my ass.
so OS doesnt solve the purpose, its the user who needs to get used to the environment.

]]> By: Choto Cheeta http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-4022 Choto Cheeta Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:37:03 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-4022 Thanks for pointing it out !!! Thanks for pointing it out !!!

]]> By: Ramesh Kumar http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/02/08/windows-server-20008-is-one-of-the-most-secure-os-of-year-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-4021 Ramesh Kumar Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:56:39 +0000 http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=997#comment-4021 Its Windows Server 2008 ;) Well congrats M$ ! Its Windows Server 2008 ;)
Well congrats M$ !

]]>