<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typos in Intel Web Site &#8211; E4700 with EM64T or without EM64T ??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chotocheeta.com/2008/07/12/typos-in-intel-web-site-e4700-with-em64t-or-without-em64t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2008/07/12/typos-in-intel-web-site-e4700-with-em64t-or-without-em64t/</link>
	<description>I would try to share what I have learnt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2008/07/12/typos-in-intel-web-site-e4700-with-em64t-or-without-em64t/comment-page-1/#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=592#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>WTF?&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;
anyway...
I have the E4700 so...
PLEASE Answers!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF?&gt;<i>&lt;<br />
anyway&#8230;<br />
I have the E4700 so&#8230;<br />
PLEASE Answers!?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel agrees on their typos about Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 web page &#124; Choto Cheeta Online</title>
		<link>http://www.chotocheeta.com/2008/07/12/typos-in-intel-web-site-e4700-with-em64t-or-without-em64t/comment-page-1/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel agrees on their typos about Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 web page &#124; Choto Cheeta Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chotocheeta.com/?p=592#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>[...] Intel has replied back on the issue with their web site, regarding contradictory information shown about Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 with its EM64T [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel has replied back on the issue with their web site, regarding contradictory information shown about Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 with its EM64T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
